|

Your school psychologists and behavior specialists
are constantly being asked to conduct Psychoeducational Evaluations and
Functional Behavior Assessments. Depending on the specific
assessment being conducted, the evaluator will conduct direct
observations in the classroom and other environments, give
"parent-teacher" questionnaires, collect observable and measureable
data, and possibly administer standardized cognitive and academic tests.
Maybe they will interview the parent and/or teacher.
However, suppose there are several people to
interview? How will the evaluator collect comprehensive
information about the student from all of these people? Take the
example of a middle school student: Five or more teachers, perhaps
a counselor, and parents to interview. At just twenty minutes per
person this would take over 2.5 hours. It rarely occurs.
Rapid Screener is a social-emotional
multi-rater assessment tools. It's a safe, simple to use, and
powerful method for enhancing the quality of nearly any school-based
assessment. Imagine being able to collect useful information from
up to ten persons and see how they view student behavior across
settings. Each rater can print out an instant summary of all oft
his or her results in a simple to understand report. Once
all of the identified raters have completed their online interviews, the
results are analyzed and summarized in a single easy-to-follow report.
If you have attended an IEP Meeting, you know they
can be lengthy, sometimes without reaching conclusions about which
behaviors need to be targeted and in what settings. It's important
not to take "shortcuts," but at the same time, teachers' time is best
spent teaching and not all parents have the luxury of sitting in a
school meeting for half a day. The Rapid Screener assessment
process insures that everyone who has significant contact with a student
has an opportunity to provide input.
When a parent doesn't understand the results of an
assessment, it's difficult for them to follow why the school is
proposing certain interventions. Even worse, they may not
understand why a child is denied special education services. is is given
a different eligibility than they believed should have been identified.
There is a remedy under IDEIA. Through Due Process, independent
assessment can be requested If a parent disagrees with the results of an
evaluation. They are given names of professionals identified as an
IEE (Independent Educational Evaluator). Once the parent and
school agree on a specific individual, that professional conduct an
assessment to once again address and assess the student's educational
needs. In some cases this is a perfectly valid request, however in
many cases, it results from families not understanding what all of the
standard scores, percentiles, correlation coefficients, T-scores, and
scales scores mean. Is a 79 good or bad? It depends.
In 1999, Investors' Business Daily reported that Due
Process cases cost school districts $50,000 to $250,000 per case.
Any school district attorney can tell you that the upper-level costs
have risen significant since that time. Even worse, new services
for a student are significantly delayed. A school district has a
couple of months to complete the initial assessment and another month to
schedule the meeting. Repeat this process with an IEE assessment
and, before you know it, another school year has passed.
Rapid Screener addresses all of these problems and
cuts through all of the "jargon" by discuss a child's behavioral
functioning in clear, easy-to-follow terms, with clear tables and
charts.

Can't see the image file above?
Click here for
the text version
I
want to try a free Rapid Screener demo right now
I'd like
to read more details
|